Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joel's avatar

I just had a series of brilliant thoughts! Kyle Tucker is going to be signed by a baseball team this winter to a long-term contract. Whatever team signs him will be greatly improving their team (look at his stats and his consistency, please). The team that signs him does not have any more financial resources than the Mets do and will have decided the price is worth it. The team that signs him has maybe one hole in the outfield while the Mets have two. Conclusion: there is not a single good reason for the Mets not to sign Tucker. And Mr. Stearns: signing Tucker has nothing to do with making a "flashy" signing to please the fans and pundits. He is--no question--the best ballplayer available and you need him.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?