Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joel's avatar

Can't understand this at all. It's not conceivable that the Mets wouldn't equal this deal. Something else had to have happened that hasn't come to light as yet. I thought the only way they lose him is if he gets a 4 or 5 year deal. Strange.

Expand full comment
Jay's avatar

Unless Diaz made it clear to the Mets that he wanted out and that the Dodgers were his top choice, I have no idea how the Mets didn't top this deal. Everyone was talking about 4 or 5 years being the issue and yet he was just signed for 3. The Mets were already trying to catch up to the Dodgers in terms of talent, how do you let your closer go to them? I can't wait to see how this one is explained by Stearns.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?