The article stated that Pete's HR numbers, or " In terms of his home run total, that matches up with where he’s been at this stage in previous years."
Now I don't know if he had big finishes in the past, but that conclusion is problematic:
Pete is on pace to hit 31 home runs this year
In his 4 full seasons (excluding 2020), Pete has hit: 53, 37 40, 46
With RBI, on pace for 83, vs. career marks of 120, 94, 131, 118
In terms of OPS, Pete is at .770;
his 4 full years are 941, 863, 869, 821
By any measure, Pete's performance is subpar.
Having said that, and given he is a poor base-runner, below average fielder by every metric, and a total goof in terms of his comments (I am in a great place he just said), I still believe the Mets should keep Pete long term, warts and all. His presence in the lineup has to matter, and even at 31 homers, it is still a factor.
Pete deserves a pay cut for his performance this season, not a huge raise. Just think of some of the old player quotes about their contract negotiations.
The article stated that Pete's HR numbers, or " In terms of his home run total, that matches up with where he’s been at this stage in previous years."
Now I don't know if he had big finishes in the past, but that conclusion is problematic:
Pete is on pace to hit 31 home runs this year
In his 4 full seasons (excluding 2020), Pete has hit: 53, 37 40, 46
With RBI, on pace for 83, vs. career marks of 120, 94, 131, 118
In terms of OPS, Pete is at .770;
his 4 full years are 941, 863, 869, 821
By any measure, Pete's performance is subpar.
Having said that, and given he is a poor base-runner, below average fielder by every metric, and a total goof in terms of his comments (I am in a great place he just said), I still believe the Mets should keep Pete long term, warts and all. His presence in the lineup has to matter, and even at 31 homers, it is still a factor.
Pete deserves a pay cut for his performance this season, not a huge raise. Just think of some of the old player quotes about their contract negotiations.