Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve's avatar

Mr. Baron:

Well done as always. To be blunt, you are very good at what you do, and we are fortunate to have your time and words..

As for Stearns, my bar was low for his postmortem and he exceeded it. BLOT: Open contrition instead of blind hubris was warranted and evident. And in the spirit of “burying the hatchet,” I will retire my drinking game of having a beer every time I hear “run prevention.” It’s been called “Defense” since the days of Doubleday (the original, not our guy…). Good first steps.

Now I (we) wait. Personally, I’m going to enjoy the Post without the anxiety of having “a dog in the fight.” Just great baseball appreciated by a lifelong fan. I’ll also do my best to ignore the anvil hanging over all our heads (the unsettled business side of things). Not the Mets needing to wheel and deal, but the pending lockout.

Enjoy the October show. You earned it too.

Steve

Joel's avatar

No, retaining Stearns is not the right call. Success is more important than "demonstrating stability". Keeping Stearns is rewarding failure. The best thing to come out of his presser is basically demoting Semien. And getting rid of that "run prevention" drivel.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?