Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joel's avatar

The argument for trading Weaver can also be made for any good player that the team controls beyond this year: it helps replenish the farm. If that's the rationale, why not trade Alvarez and Torrens as well? That would be a bad idea, as is trading Weaver, unless you get a great return from a desperate team. Since Brazoban is under control through '29, I don't think the Mets got such a great return. Sure, he's inconsistent, but who is going to help the Mets more in '27, Brazoban or the prospect they got who's been getting beaten up in AAA? Remember, this team is supposed to contend in '27, isn't that the hope?

Turfseer's avatar

What exactly does the front office think all these mid-level prospects are going to do for the 2027 Mets? The odds are that most of these so-called prospects will never become productive major leaguers. I notice there aren't any top-10 prospects in these deals—just organizational depth and lottery tickets.

Who's left to build around next year? Polanco? Baty? Vientos? That's not the core of a contender.

If Steve Cohen wants this team competing next season, he'll have to do what only he can do: open the checkbook for proven major leaguers—not another wave of "potential." The Mets don't need more players who might develop someday. They need legitimate hitters who can bat .275, get on base, and produce immediately. Otherwise, 2027 could look a lot like 2026.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?