9 Comments
User's avatar
Steve's avatar

I do want Pete back but at the shortest term that’s realistic. How about 4 for $100m? I’d rather Pete on a contract like that than Bregman for 6-7 years

Expand full comment
Michael Baron's avatar

I think Pete is in for a 4-5 year deal now, based on what else has transpired in the market.

Expand full comment
Kevin J. Rogers's avatar

I'm pretty sure your numbers are right on the nose: something like five years in the $120-125 million range. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to learn they're really close and haggling over an option on the tail end or something.

Expand full comment
Michael Baron's avatar

I think the Mets hold quite a bit of leverage, but they don’t want to screw over a homegrown star too. They’re not going to do something stupid but they’re also not going to low ball him either. They’ll do something fair and comfortable for both sides, even if there are options built into the end.

Expand full comment
Kevin J. Rogers's avatar

I think this is exactly right, too.

Expand full comment
Matthew Davis's avatar

I bet Pete wishes he was a starting pitcher now.

Expand full comment
Sean B's avatar

I will never understand these situations. The fans love Pete, he can handle the pressure of NY, his teammates love him, he hits for a ton of power - the Mets win by resigning him. Pete's already established himself here so even if he tails off, he's earned whatever money he's getting from the previous 5 years of above average play, HR records, etc. Leaving for a little more money to a new market restarts his stats at zero and he needs to prove himself to a new fan base that only sees the dollars he's earning or rather - not earning. Pujols is a great example of this. Your first slump on a new team will have people screaming for your head. Taking a little bit less to stay with your home fans will still earn you millions in endorsements, etc. I never begrudge players from getting paid max value, but there's something to be said for tenure and seniority and all the benefits, perks and patience from fans that come with that.

The Mets have the money, so even if they overpay a bit for a homegrown star - they still come out on top on the PR and goodwill side. And listen - even a "down" year for Alonso is pretty great. Scott Boras seems to consistently go for most dollars, not most overall value to his clients.

Expand full comment
Peter Mat's avatar

Both parties need one another, so let reason rise to the top. As Solomon would suggest lets split it all at 4 years for 120., and get ready for a strong lefty, righty 3-4 in the everyday lineup

Expand full comment
Daniel's avatar

Alonso 3 years 75 million to DH

Move Vientos to 1B, give Baty one more shot at 3b.

If Baty falters, then one could try Mauricio there or put Vientos back at 3b and Alonso at 1b

Expand full comment