Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joe From the Bronx's avatar

I think the players should determine if they want a captain, and it should not be a top-down thing. The captain need not be fixed for an extended time. They can serve for the season or whatever.

I'm not overly concerned about it, but the owner setting the policy rubs me the wrong way.

A designated leader can help team chemistry and leadership in the locker room. It helps take responsibility and helps avoid fracturing the clubhouse.

James Schwartz's avatar

If Melendez has a big spring and with the recent signing of Tauchman (who if you look at slug numbers at 350 Ab) he’s right there with the greats like Soto and Judge and Ohtani. I can see a situation where Taylor gets squeezed out. His bat has left something to hardly be desired and if you can get a guy who crushes lefties (Tauchman) and Melendez covering the outfield plus Melendez being an emergency 3rd catcher that lines up with Stearns and his love for players who can have super utility. I see a trade coming as the Mets aren’t going to have the logjam for the infield they did last season which will take a lot of Mendy’s plate and trying to get ABs for Vientos and Baty and Mauricio who is mostly likely going to AAA to get regular playing time unless Lindor isn’t ready for opening day and Mauricio gets the nod over the glove first bargain bin guys that are here right now. I think the Mets are going to get Clevinger from the Rays with Vientos and either Baty and Mauricio or another minor league down roster player that has control and not in the top 10/15. Unless Yandy Diaz is added then you gotta sweeten the pot. Mendy is terrible at roster juggling and less options need to be made to help him keep the culture that he’s in charge of. I believe there’s a real world where Vientos gets DFA’d if he isn’t traded. He offers zero defense and if he isn’t going to get serious ABs? No value here.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?