11 Comments
User's avatar
Larry Kahan's avatar

I really don't see the point in moving Alvarez, especially since we don't really have anyone in the pipeline to replace him. Torrens is a great backup, but he's not a full-time player. The more he plays, the less value he produces.

Larry Kahan's avatar

Wouldn't it be just like the Mets to trade Robert Jr and he goes on a Cespedes-like tear for his new team, leading them to the World Series? Then, he'll sign a big free agent contract and play in less than 50% of the games for his new team, due to injuries.

Joel's avatar

Hope he goes on a tear so we can get more back for him.

Joe From the Bronx's avatar

Cespedes is a prime case of a player going on a run, being overpaid, and then coming back to earth. He wasn't even all that in the postseason (he might have had moments, but Murphy was more important). I agree with you on the catcher situation. Who are you going to replace him with? If there was someone out there, maybe.

Dave S's avatar

Alvarez is approaching .800 ops and 270 average. I’d move him up in lineup. His fielding is still poor. He’s young but can he be a good defensive catcher. For a starting first baseman yes. Otherwise no.

Joel's avatar

Glad you changed your mind about Alvarez. But a big difference you didn't discuss is that Holmes will decline his option while Weaver is signed through next year. Since Holmes might walk after this year, it makes more sense to trade him to a contender and maybe even try to resign him when he becomes a FA. Even if you can get an impressive return for Weaver, you can't deny it will weaken the bullpen next year, especially since Minter and Raley probably won't be back.

Steve's avatar

Mr. Steele:

Love the way you framed President Stearns' remarks: "Mets President of Baseball Operations David Stearns spoke to the media prior to Friday’s game in his regular homestand availability."

Fitting. Sounds like the fellow came out of his blast-proof bunker because us meddling, pesky people visited and he had to say SOMETHING..... Glad to learn he is disappointed with his assemblage. We are too. Also kind of him to dispense HoF plaques for this week's kids while seeking to shed remaining vestiges of tenured players predating his arrival. Not to mention seeking to deal the batch of youngsters he touted the last time he was bestowing HoF plaques to recent call-ups (last year).

Do hope he returned to his bunker and is comfy. Await our audience with him when the team returns after its next road trip. Suspense builds as we wait to learn what he does next. I.m sure it will be great. Best ever!!!

Yeah, probably not your intention, and I'm mouthing off due to being disappointed - ok REALLY pissed off - with his job performance. But Presidents can be that way from time to time. Eventually they get tired of not having their genius recognized while being absurdly well rewarded. Then they find someplace else to go. After all, they have experience leading a big organization in a complex environment! Somebody else will surely pay to have that talent fix their club!

Steve

Joel's avatar

Harsh, brother Steve! I do think he's made a hash of it but I don't get the personal antipathy toward the guy.

Jeff's avatar

If the Mets aren’t willing to play Alvarez anywhere but catcher they should trade him. He gets hurt too frequently to keep catching. DH? First Base? Keep. Catcher? Best available offer

Steve1962's avatar

Personally, I would extend Holmes. Now maybe Stearns is thinking that he could trade him for a lot now and then sign him in the offseason. Maybe. Or maybe Cohen said use my money to sign Skubal and Michael King instead. Of course, the Dodgers might screw up that plan.

I'd also keep Weaver and Brazobán. Replacing both Minter and Raley will be tough enough. Same with Alvarez.

The big needs will be to add a first and second baseman. Bauers and Lowe as free agents? Roberts gets dealt now; Vientos in the offseason. Baty and Semien are kept as bench guys.

Loss of draft picks. Win now while Soto and Lindor still have some youth left.

Joe From the Bronx's avatar

The botched play on the sacrifice bunt (the DODGERS should have had the blame; the bunt went right back to the pitcher & a safety squeeze is about not being caught in that situation) could have been the play of the game if the Dodgers didn't tack on runs.

And, of course, Ohtani got the sacrifice fly. Todd Zeile said he didn't mind not walking him since the guy coming up is good at bringing in runs. But, come on, it's Ohtani.

I want them to keep Holmes. My understanding is that they might not be able to negotiate an extension. I'm not quite sure why, but if that's true, it is more understandable.

Sean Manaea should get some trade offers. The boy genius supposedly said the Mets aren't willing to eat much salary in trades. That could be a red flag in his case, perhaps.